PAKET UMROH BULAN FEBRUARI MARET APRIL MEI 2017

TRAVEL UMROH RESMI KEMENAG RI

Call / WA: SEPTINA 0821-1420-2323 / Klik disini

 
Lihat Biaya Umroh 2018 Lihat Paket Umroh Desember 2017




Artikel lainnya »

Mengubah Hidup
Dengan Membaca Rahasia Perjuangan Hidup Orang Lain?
Kenapa Tidak?!

Saya pun memulainya dengan pengetahuan internet dan bisnis yang nol besar
namun kini...
Saya Adalah Pemilik Bisnis Yang Dapat Diwariskan melalui Internet!

Klik disini untuk mengetahuinya!

BISNIS LEWAT INTERNET

saco-indonesia.com, Memberikan apresiasi kepada anggota Komunitas FansClub JKT48 sekaligus telah memanfaatkan momen libur akhir tahun, Indosat telah mengajak 50 anggota terbaik untuk hangout seharian bersama personel JKT48.

Ke 50 anggota ini telah mendapat kesempatan untuk makan siang, meet & greet dan berfoto bersama personel JKT48, yang kemudian dilanjutkan dengan Nonton Film terbaru box office dan ditutup dengan Dinner dan Nonton langsung Konser Teater JKT48 di Teater JKT48 FX.

Ke-50 anggota Komunitas FansClub JKT48 ini juga merupakan anggota yang telah terpilih dari 15 ribu member komunitas JKT48 nasional, yang telah diseleksi dengan melihat reload dari masing-masing anggota mulai bulan Juni sampai November 2013 dan mereka adalah anggota dengan reload tertinggi dari seluruh Indonesia.

Program apresiasi ini juga merupakan salah satu komitmen kami bagi para member komunitas JKT48 terbaik dari seluruh Indonesia, sambil memanfaatkan liburan seru bersama IM3, ujar Agus Nurudin, Group Head National Channel Management Indosat, dalam siaran pers.

JKT48 telah dipilih selain karena sebagai Brand Ambassador Indosat IM3 juga telah mempunyai banyak fans yang sangat loyal. Program apresiasi dan retensi semacam ini rutin diberikan Indosat sebagai bentuk penghargaan atas loyalitas para anggota komunitas dalam menggunakan produk Indosat.

Dengan program apresiasi ini diharapkan para anggota komunitas semakin setia dan terus menggunakan produk Indosat serta menjadi word of mouth dalam mempromosikan produk dan layanan Indosat, tambah Agus.

Komunitas JKT48 juga merupakan bagian dari anggota komunitas Sahabat IM3 yaitu komunitas anak muda di sekolah-sekolah yang saat ini sudah berjumlah belasan ribu komunitas sekolah yang tersebar di seluruh Indonesia.

Para siswa yang telah tergabung dalam komunitas Sahabat IM3 ini juga akan menikmati berbagai keuntungan diantaranya tarif telepon dan SMS murah ke sesama teman sekolahnya dalam satu komunitas.

Selain itu indosat juga bekerja sama dengan sekolah untuk dapat mendukung kegiatan belajar mengajar dengan pemberian sarana mengajar ke sekolah seperti akses internet, super WiFi, finger print, mendukung kegiatan sekolah seperti pentas seni serta aktifitas lain yang berguna bagi sekolah.


Editor : Dian Sukmawati

INDOSAT PILIH 50 PELANGGAN HANGOUT

Tak semua orang yang telah melakukan diet akan mendapatkan hasil yang mereka idam-idamkan. Ini bukan berarti dietnya yang salah, tetapi bisa juga orang tersebut melakukan kesalahan sehingga dietnya tak berhasil.

Kesalahan diet yang tanpa sadar dilakukan oleh banyak orang biasanya telah membuat diet mereka gagal. Berikut adalah empat kesalahan diet terbesar yang dilakukan wanita :

1. Hanya menghitung kalori
Ketika menurunkan berat badan, banyak orang terjebak oleh pilihan antara kualitas dan kuantitas. Mereka lebih fokus pada menghitung kalori daripada keseluruhan diet yang mereka lakukan. Padahal cara semacam itu tak selalu berhasil. Daripada menghitung kalori, akan lebih baik untuk dapat memilih makanan yang menyehatkan seperti sayur dan buah dan memasukkannya dalam diet. Jus sayuran di pagi hari adalah cara yang baik untuk mendapatkan banyak nutrisi sekaligus menurunkan berat badan.

2. Tidak konsisten
Aktivitas yang padat dan kesibukan seringkali telah membuat jadwal berantakan. Tak hanya jadwal sehari-hari, tetapi juga jadwal diet. Hal ini yang dapat membuat diet menjadi gagal karena usaha yang tidak konsisten. Beberapa orang biasanya melakukan diet ketat beberapa hari, namun pada hari-hari selanjutnya mereka makan sembarangan. Meski aktivitas padat, usahakan tetap konsisten melakukan diet dan mengikuti aturan diet yang sedang dilakukan.

3. Kurang minum air
Ketika berdiet kebanyakan orang hanya fokus pada makanan yang mereka konsumsi. Namun mereka mengabaikan jumlah air yang harus dikonsumsi. Agar tubuh bisa bekerja dengan baik dan diet lancar, Anda juga harus mengonsumsi cukup air agar tubuh tidak dehidrasi. Terkadang banyak orang yang menyalahartikan rasa haus dengan lapar, sehingga mereka malah mengonsumsi banyak makanan dan kurang minum air. Minum banyak air juga penting untuk kesehatan tubuh. Kurang air bisa menyebabkan masalah seperti lesu, sakit kepala, atau pusing.

4. Makan secara emosional
Jangan salah, emosi juga bisa mempengaruhi pola makan Anda. Orang yang makan secara emosional biasanya mengonsumsi lebih banyak makanan yang gak sehat. Makan secara emosional biasanya juga disebabkan oleh jadwal yang padat. Untuk dapat menghindari ini, sebaiknya siapkan makanan ringan yang sehat agar ketika Anda tak punya waktu, Anda bisa mengonsumsi makanan yang tetap sehat.

Itulah beberapa kesalahan besar yang dilakukan oleh wanita ketika berdiet. Biasanya, mereka tak sadar melakukan kesalahan tersebut, dan pada akhirnya diet mereka tak membuahkan hasil yang diinginkan. Jika Anda sedang berdiet, sebaiknya hindari kesalahan-kesalahan di atas.

4 Kesalahan diet terbesar yang dilakukan wanita

Sako-Indonesia.com - Banyak orang yang merasa lebih cocok memakai lensa kontak ketimbang kacamata untuk memperbaiki fokus penglihatan. Sayangnya, penggunaan lensa kontak yang semakin mudah tak dibarengi dengan perawatan kebersihan yang baik.

Jika kita kurang teliti dalam membersihkan, lensa kontak bisa menjadi sumber infeksi. Itu sebabnya para pengguna lensa kontak harus mewaspadai 8 kondisi berikut ini.

1. Saat menyentuh lensa kontak
Cuci tangan dengan sabun sebelum menyentuh lensa kontak atau mata Anda. Sebaiknya kuku tidak terlalu panjang agar tidak menggores lensa. Jangan pernah menggunakan air keran atau air ludah untuk membersihkan lensa. Hanya gunakan cairan pembersih khusus lensa kontak.

2. Dipakai terlalu lama
Ada alasan penting mengapa para dokter tak menyarankan penggunaan lensa kontak terlalu lama. Lensa kontak menghambat oksigen ke mata. Jika Anda menggunakannya terlalu lama, misalnya malas membukanya saat tidur, bisa berpotensi menyebabkan luka pada kornea.

3. Menggunakan obat
Anda harus membuka dulu lensa kontak sebelum memakai berbagai jenis obat tetes mata. Namun, beberapa jenis obat, seperti pil kontrasepsi yang meningkatkan hormon estrogen bisa membuat mata lebih sensitif dan lebih kering. Demikian juga dengan obat jerawat yang bisa menyebabkan sensasi gatal pada mata.

4. Mata terlalu kering
Karena lensa kontak melapisi permukaan mata dan menahan oksigen, banyak pengguna lensa kontak yang mengalami mata kering. Kekeringan tersebut bisa bertambah parah dalam kondisi tertentu, seperti di pesawat, di cuaca kering, atau minum alkohol.

5. Cairan pembersih
Cairan pembersih (solution) lensa kontak memiliki banyak variasi, ada yang hanya membilas, membunuh kuman, atau membasahi mata untuk meningkatkan produksi air mata. Setiap produk tersebut mengandung pengawet yang bisa kadaluarsa atau mengiritasi mata. Karena itu hindari memakai produk yang sudah lewat masa pakainya. Selain itu, hindari kebiasaan memindahkan solution ke wadah kecil saat traveling karena bisa meningkatkan risiko kontaminasi.

6. Berdandan
Alat make-up bisa menjadi sarana infeksi. Untuk itu hindari meminjamkan maskara, eyeliner, atau eye shadow, dengan orang yang sedang sakit mata atau matanya iritasi. Selain itu, pakailah lensa kontak sebelum berdandan dan lepaslah lensa kontak sebelum membersihkan kosmetik.

7. Di luar ruangan
Partikel kecil di udara seperti debu, asap, atau bulu binatang, bisa masuk ke mata dan membuat iritasi. Lebih disarankan untuk tidak memakai kacamata saat naik motor.

8. Berenang
Tentu tak mungkin berenang dengan kacamata. Tetapi memakai softlens saat berenang di kolam yang mengandung klorin bisa membuat lensa kontak terkontaminasi. Sebaiknya lepaskan lensa kontak saat berenang dan tunggu satu jam sebelum memakai lensa kontak kembali.

 
Edditor: Maulana Lee
Yang Perlu Diwaspadai Pemakai Lensa Kontak

A former member of the Boston Symphony Orchestra, Mr. Smedvig helped found the wide-ranging Empire Brass quintet.

Rolf Smedvig, Trumpeter in the Empire Brass, Dies at 62

Imagine an elite professional services firm with a high-performing, workaholic culture. Everyone is expected to turn on a dime to serve a client, travel at a moment’s notice, and be available pretty much every evening and weekend. It can make for a grueling work life, but at the highest levels of accounting, law, investment banking and consulting firms, it is just the way things are.

Except for one dirty little secret: Some of the people ostensibly turning in those 80- or 90-hour workweeks, particularly men, may just be faking it.

Many of them were, at least, at one elite consulting firm studied by Erin Reid, a professor at Boston University’s Questrom School of Business. It’s impossible to know if what she learned at that unidentified consulting firm applies across the world of work more broadly. But her research, published in the academic journal Organization Science, offers a way to understand how the professional world differs between men and women, and some of the ways a hard-charging culture that emphasizes long hours above all can make some companies worse off.

Photo
 
Credit Peter Arkle

Ms. Reid interviewed more than 100 people in the American offices of a global consulting firm and had access to performance reviews and internal human resources documents. At the firm there was a strong culture around long hours and responding to clients promptly.

“When the client needs me to be somewhere, I just have to be there,” said one of the consultants Ms. Reid interviewed. “And if you can’t be there, it’s probably because you’ve got another client meeting at the same time. You know it’s tough to say I can’t be there because my son had a Cub Scout meeting.”

Some people fully embraced this culture and put in the long hours, and they tended to be top performers. Others openly pushed back against it, insisting upon lighter and more flexible work hours, or less travel; they were punished in their performance reviews.

The third group is most interesting. Some 31 percent of the men and 11 percent of the women whose records Ms. Reid examined managed to achieve the benefits of a more moderate work schedule without explicitly asking for it.

They made an effort to line up clients who were local, reducing the need for travel. When they skipped work to spend time with their children or spouse, they didn’t call attention to it. One team on which several members had small children agreed among themselves to cover for one another so that everyone could have more flexible hours.

A male junior manager described working to have repeat consulting engagements with a company near enough to his home that he could take care of it with day trips. “I try to head out by 5, get home at 5:30, have dinner, play with my daughter,” he said, adding that he generally kept weekend work down to two hours of catching up on email.

Despite the limited hours, he said: “I know what clients are expecting. So I deliver above that.” He received a high performance review and a promotion.

What is fascinating about the firm Ms. Reid studied is that these people, who in her terminology were “passing” as workaholics, received performance reviews that were as strong as their hyper-ambitious colleagues. For people who were good at faking it, there was no real damage done by their lighter workloads.

It calls to mind the episode of “Seinfeld” in which George Costanza leaves his car in the parking lot at Yankee Stadium, where he works, and gets a promotion because his boss sees the car and thinks he is getting to work earlier and staying later than anyone else. (The strategy goes awry for him, and is not recommended for any aspiring partners in a consulting firm.)

A second finding is that women, particularly those with young children, were much more likely to request greater flexibility through more formal means, such as returning from maternity leave with an explicitly reduced schedule. Men who requested a paternity leave seemed to be punished come review time, and so may have felt more need to take time to spend with their families through those unofficial methods.

The result of this is easy to see: Those specifically requesting a lighter workload, who were disproportionately women, suffered in their performance reviews; those who took a lighter workload more discreetly didn’t suffer. The maxim of “ask forgiveness, not permission” seemed to apply.

It would be dangerous to extrapolate too much from a study at one firm, but Ms. Reid said in an interview that since publishing a summary of her research in Harvard Business Review she has heard from people in a variety of industries describing the same dynamic.

High-octane professional service firms are that way for a reason, and no one would doubt that insane hours and lots of travel can be necessary if you’re a lawyer on the verge of a big trial, an accountant right before tax day or an investment banker advising on a huge merger.

But the fact that the consultants who quietly lightened their workload did just as well in their performance reviews as those who were truly working 80 or more hours a week suggests that in normal times, heavy workloads may be more about signaling devotion to a firm than really being more productive. The person working 80 hours isn’t necessarily serving clients any better than the person working 50.

In other words, maybe the real problem isn’t men faking greater devotion to their jobs. Maybe it’s that too many companies reward the wrong things, favoring the illusion of extraordinary effort over actual productivity.

How Some Men Fake an 80-Hour Workweek, and Why It Matters

Mr. Miller, of the firm Weil, Gotshal & Manges, represented companies including Lehman Brothers, General Motors and American Airlines, and mentored many of the top Chapter 11 practitioners today.

Harvey R. Miller, Renowned Bankruptcy Lawyer, Dies at 82

Since a white police officer, Darren Wilson fatally shot unarmed black teenager, Michael Brown, in a confrontation last August in Ferguson, Mo., there have been many other cases in which the police have shot and killed suspects, some of them unarmed. Mr. Brown's death set off protests throughout the country, pushing law enforcement into the spotlight and sparking a public debate on police tactics. Here is a selection of police shootings that have been reported by news organizations since Mr. Brown's death. In some cases, investigations are continuing.

Photo
 
 
The apartment complex northeast of Atlanta where Anthony Hill, 27, was fatally shot by a DeKalb County police officer. Credit Ben Gray/Atlanta Journal Constitution

Chamblee, Ga.
Fatal Police Shootings: Accounts Since Ferguson

Judge Patterson helped to protect the rights of Attica inmates after the prison riot in 1971 and later served on the Federal District Court in Manhattan.

Robert Patterson Jr., Lawyer and Judge Who Fought for the Accused, Dies at 91

Mr. Fox, known for his well-honed countrified voice, wrote about things dear to South Carolina and won over Yankee critics.

William Price Fox, Admired Southern Novelist and Humorist, Dies at 89

WASHINGTON — A decade after emergency trailers meant to shelter Hurricane Katrina victims instead caused burning eyes, sore throats and other more serious ailments, the Environmental Protection Agency is on the verge of regulating the culprit: formaldehyde, a chemical that can be found in commonplace things like clothes and furniture.

But an unusual assortment of players, including furniture makers, the Chinese government, Republicans from states with a large base of furniture manufacturing and even some Democrats who championed early regulatory efforts, have questioned the E.P.A. proposal. The sustained opposition has held sway, as the agency is now preparing to ease key testing requirements before it releases the landmark federal health standard.

The E.P.A.’s five-year effort to adopt this rule offers another example of how industry opposition can delay and hamper attempts by the federal government to issue regulations, even to control substances known to be harmful to human health.

Continue reading the main story
 

Document: The Formaldehyde Fight

Formaldehyde is a known carcinogen that can also cause respiratory ailments like asthma, but the potential of long-term exposure to cause cancers like myeloid leukemia is less well understood.

The E.P.A.’s decision would be the first time that the federal government has regulated formaldehyde inside most American homes.

“The stakes are high for public health,” said Tom Neltner, senior adviser for regulatory affairs at the National Center for Healthy Housing, who has closely monitored the debate over the rules. “What we can’t have here is an outcome that fails to confront the health threat we all know exists.”

The proposal would not ban formaldehyde — commonly used as an ingredient in wood glue in furniture and flooring — but it would impose rules that prevent dangerous levels of the chemical’s vapors from those products, and would set testing standards to ensure that products sold in the United States comply with those limits. The debate has sharpened in the face of growing concern about the safety of formaldehyde-treated flooring imported from Asia, especially China.

What is certain is that a lot of money is at stake: American companies sell billions of dollars’ worth of wood products each year that contain formaldehyde, and some argue that the proposed regulation would impose unfair costs and restrictions.

Determined to block the agency’s rule as proposed, these industry players have turned to the White House, members of Congress and top E.P.A. officials, pressing them to roll back the testing requirements in particular, calling them redundant and too expensive.

“There are potentially over a million manufacturing jobs that will be impacted if the proposed rule is finalized without changes,” wrote Bill Perdue, the chief lobbyist at the American Home Furnishings Alliance, a leading critic of the testing requirements in the proposed regulation, in one letter to the E.P.A.

Industry opposition helped create an odd alignment of forces working to thwart the rule. The White House moved to strike out key aspects of the proposal. Subsequent appeals for more changes were voiced by players as varied as Senator Barbara Boxer, Democrat of California, and Senator Roger Wicker, Republican of Mississippi, as well as furniture industry lobbyists.

Hurricane Katrina in 2005 helped ignite the public debate over formaldehyde, after the deadly storm destroyed or damaged hundreds of thousands of homes along the Gulf of Mexico, forcing families into temporary trailers provided by the Federal Emergency Management Agency.

The displaced storm victims quickly began reporting respiratory problems, burning eyes and other issues, and tests then confirmed high levels of formaldehyde fumes leaking into the air inside the trailers, which in many cases had been hastily constructed.

Public health advocates petitioned the E.P.A. to issue limits on formaldehyde in building materials and furniture used in homes, given that limits already existed for exposure in workplaces. But three years after the storm, only California had issued such limits.

Industry groups like the American Chemistry Council have repeatedly challenged the science linking formaldehyde to cancer, a position championed by David Vitter, the Republican senator from Louisiana, who is a major recipient of chemical industry campaign contributions, and whom environmental groups have mockingly nicknamed “Senator Formaldehyde.”

Continue reading the main story

Formaldehyde in Laminate Flooring

In laminate flooring, formaldehyde is used as a bonding agent in the fiberboard (or other composite wood) core layer and may also be used in glues that bind layers together. Concerns were raised in March when certain laminate flooring imported from China was reported to contain levels of formaldehyde far exceeding the limit permitted by California.

Typical

laminate

flooring

CLEAR FINISH LAYER

Often made of melamine resin

PATTERN LAYER

Paper printed to resemble wood,

or a thin wood veneer

GLUE

Layers may be bound using

formaldehyde-based glues

CORE LAYER

Fiberboard or other

composite, formed using

formaldehyde-based adhesives

BASE LAYER

Moisture-resistant vapor barrier

What is formaldehyde?

Formaldehyde is a common chemical used in many industrial and household products as an adhesive, bonding agent or preservative. It is classified as a volatile organic compound. The term volatile means that, at room temperature, formaldehyde will vaporize, or become a gas. Products made with formaldehyde tend to release this gas into the air. If breathed in large quantities, it may cause health problems.

WHERE IT IS COMMONLY FOUND

POTENTIAL HEALTH RISKS

Pressed-wood and composite wood products

Wallpaper and paints

Spray foam insulation used in construction

Commercial wood floor finishes

Crease-resistant fabrics

In cigarette smoke, or in the fumes from combustion of other materials, including wood, oil and gasoline.

Exposure to formaldehyde in sufficient amounts may cause eye, throat or skin irritation, allergic reactions, and respiratory problems like coughing, wheezing or asthma.

Long-term exposure to high levels has been associated with cancer in humans and laboratory animals.

Exposure to formaldehyde may affect some people more severely than others.

By 2010, public health advocates and some industry groups secured bipartisan support in Congress for legislation that ordered the E.P.A. to issue federal rules that largely mirrored California’s restrictions. At the time, concerns were rising over the growing number of lower-priced furniture imports from Asia that might include contaminated products, while also hurting sales of American-made products.

Maneuvering began almost immediately after the E.P.A. prepared draft rules to formally enact the new standards.

White House records show at least five meetings in mid-2012 with industry executives — kitchen cabinet makers, chemical manufacturers, furniture trade associations and their lobbyists, like Brock R. Landry, of the Venable law firm. These parties, along with Senator Vitter’s office, appealed to top administration officials, asking them to intervene to roll back the E.P.A. proposal.

The White House Office of Management and Budget, which reviews major federal regulations before they are adopted, apparently agreed. After the White House review, the E.P.A. “redlined” many of the estimates of the monetary benefits that would be gained by reductions in related health ailments, like asthma and fertility issues, documents reviewed by The New York Times show.

As a result, the estimated benefit of the proposed rule dropped to $48 million a year, from as much as $278 million a year. The much-reduced amount deeply weakened the agency’s justification for the sometimes costly new testing that would be required under the new rules, a federal official involved in the effort said.

“It’s a redlining blood bath,” said Lisa Heinzerling, a Georgetown University Law School professor and a former E.P.A. official, using the Washington phrase to describe when language is stricken from a proposed rule. “Almost the entire discussion of these potential benefits was excised.”

Senator Vitter’s staff was pleased.

“That’s a huge difference,” said Luke Bolar, a spokesman for Mr. Vitter, of the reduced estimated financial benefits, saying the change was “clearly highlighting more mismanagement” at the E.P.A.

Advertisement

The review’s outcome galvanized opponents in the furniture industry. They then targeted a provision that mandated new testing of laminated wood, a cheaper alternative to hardwood. (The California standard on which the law was based did not require such testing.)

But E.P.A. scientists had concluded that these laminate products — millions of which are sold annually in the United States — posed a particular risk. They said that when thin layers of wood, also known as laminate or veneer, are added to furniture or flooring in the final stages of manufacturing, the resulting product can generate dangerous levels of fumes from often-used formaldehyde-based glues.

Industry executives, outraged by what they considered an unnecessary and financially burdensome level of testing, turned every lever within reach to get the requirement removed. It would be particularly onerous, they argued, for small manufacturers that would have to repeatedly interrupt their work to do expensive new testing. The E.P.A. estimated that the expanded requirements for laminate products would cost the furniture industry tens of millions of dollars annually, while the industry said that the proposed rule over all would cost its 7,000 American manufacturing facilities over $200 million each year.

“A lot of people don’t seem to appreciate what a lot of these requirements do to a small operation,” said Dick Titus, executive vice president of the Kitchen Cabinet Manufacturers Association, whose members are predominantly small businesses. “A 10-person shop, for example, just really isn’t equipped to handle that type of thing.”

Photo
 
Becky Gillette wants strong regulation of formaldehyde. Credit Beth Hall for The New York Times

Big industry players also weighed in. Executives from companies including La-Z-Boy, Hooker Furniture and Ashley Furniture all flew to Washington for a series of meetings with the offices of lawmakers including House Speaker John Boehner, Republican of Ohio, and about a dozen other lawmakers, asking several of them to sign a letter prepared by the industry to press the E.P.A. to back down, according to an industry report describing the lobbying visit.

Within a matter of weeks, two letters — using nearly identical language — were sent by House and Senate lawmakers to the E.P.A. — with the industry group forwarding copies of the letters to the agency as well, and then posting them on its website.

The industry lobbyists also held their own meeting at E.P.A. headquarters, and they urged Jim Jones, who oversaw the rule-making process as the assistant administrator for the agency’s Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, to visit a North Carolina furniture manufacturing plant. According to the trade group, Mr. Jones told them that the visit had “helped the agency shift its thinking” about the rules and how laminated products should be treated.

The resistance was particularly intense from lawmakers like Mr. Wicker of Mississippi, whose state is home to major manufacturing plants owned by Ashley Furniture Industries, the world’s largest furniture maker, and who is one of the biggest recipients in Congress of donations from the industry’s trade association. Asked if the political support played a role, a spokesman for Mr. Wicker replied: “Thousands of Mississippians depend on the furniture manufacturing industry for their livelihoods. Senator Wicker is committed to defending all Mississippians from government overreach.”

Individual companies like Ikea also intervened, as did the Chinese government, which claimed that the new rule would create a “great barrier” to the import of Chinese products because of higher costs.

Perhaps the most surprising objection came from Senator Boxer, of California, a longtime environmental advocate, whose office questioned why the E.P.A.’s rule went further than her home state’s in seeking testing on laminated products. “We did not advocate an outcome, other than safety,” her office said in a statement about why the senator raised concerns. “We said ‘Take a look to see if you have it right.’ ”

Safety advocates say that tighter restrictions — like the ones Ms. Boxer and Mr. Wicker, along with Representative Doris Matsui, a California Democrat, have questioned — are necessary, particularly for products coming from China, where items as varied as toys and Christmas lights have been found to violate American safety standards.

While Mr. Neltner, the environmental advocate who has been most involved in the review process, has been open to compromise, he has pressed the E.P.A. not to back down entirely, and to maintain a requirement that laminators verify that their products are safe.

An episode of CBS’s “60 Minutes” in March brought attention to the issue when it accused Lumber Liquidators, the discount flooring retailer, of selling laminate products with dangerous levels of formaldehyde. The company has disputed the show’s findings and test methods, maintaining that its products are safe.

“People think that just because Congress passed the legislation five years ago, the problem has been fixed,” said Becky Gillette, who then lived in coastal Mississippi, in the area hit by Hurricane Katrina, and was among the first to notice a pattern of complaints from people living in the trailers. “Real people’s faces and names come up in front of me when I think of the thousands of people who could get sick if this rule is not done right.”

An aide to Ms. Matsui rejected any suggestion that she was bending to industry pressure.

“From the beginning the public health has been our No. 1 concern,” said Kyle J. Victor, an aide to Ms. Matsui.

But further changes to the rule are likely, agency officials concede, as they say they are searching for a way to reduce the cost of complying with any final rule while maintaining public health goals. The question is just how radically the agency will revamp the testing requirement for laminated products — if it keeps it at all.

“It’s not a secret to anybody that is the most challenging issue,” said Mr. Jones, the E.P.A. official overseeing the process, adding that the health consequences from formaldehyde are real. “We have to reduce those exposures so that people can live healthy lives and not have to worry about being in their homes.”

The Uphill Battle to Better Regulate Formaldehyde

WASHINGTON — The former deputy director of the C.I.A. asserts in a forthcoming book that Republicans, in their eagerness to politicize the killing of the American ambassador to Libya, repeatedly distorted the agency’s analysis of events. But he also argues that the C.I.A. should get out of the business of providing “talking points” for administration officials in national security events that quickly become partisan, as happened after the Benghazi attack in 2012.

The official, Michael J. Morell, dismisses the allegation that the United States military and C.I.A. officers “were ordered to stand down and not come to the rescue of their comrades,” and he says there is “no evidence” to support the charge that “there was a conspiracy between C.I.A. and the White House to spin the Benghazi story in a way that would protect the political interests of the president and Secretary Clinton,” referring to the secretary of state at the time, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

But he also concludes that the White House itself embellished some of the talking points provided by the Central Intelligence Agency and had blocked him from sending an internal study of agency conclusions to Congress.

Photo
 
Michael J. Morell Credit Mark Wilson/Getty Images

“I finally did so without asking,” just before leaving government, he writes, and after the White House released internal emails to a committee investigating the State Department’s handling of the issue.

A lengthy congressional investigation remains underway, one that many Republicans hope to use against Mrs. Clinton in the 2016 election cycle.

In parts of the book, “The Great War of Our Time” (Twelve), Mr. Morell praises his C.I.A. colleagues for many successes in stopping terrorist attacks, but he is surprisingly critical of other C.I.A. failings — and those of the National Security Agency.

Soon after Mr. Morell retired in 2013 after 33 years in the agency, President Obama appointed him to a commission reviewing the actions of the National Security Agency after the disclosures of Edward J. Snowden, a former intelligence contractor who released classified documents about the government’s eavesdropping abilities. Mr. Morell writes that he was surprised by what he found.

Advertisement

“You would have thought that of all the government entities on the planet, the one least vulnerable to such grand theft would have been the N.S.A.,” he writes. “But it turned out that the N.S.A. had left itself vulnerable.”

He concludes that most Wall Street firms had better cybersecurity than the N.S.A. had when Mr. Snowden swept information from its systems in 2013. While he said he found himself “chagrined by how well the N.S.A. was doing” compared with the C.I.A. in stepping up its collection of data on intelligence targets, he also sensed that the N.S.A., which specializes in electronic spying, was operating without considering the implications of its methods.

“The N.S.A. had largely been collecting information because it could, not necessarily in all cases because it should,” he says.

The book is to be released next week.

Mr. Morell was a career analyst who rose through the ranks of the agency, and he ended up in the No. 2 post. He served as President George W. Bush’s personal intelligence briefer in the first months of his presidency — in those days, he could often be spotted at the Starbucks in Waco, Tex., catching up on his reading — and was with him in the schoolhouse in Florida on the morning of Sept. 11, 2001, when the Bush presidency changed in an instant.

Mr. Morell twice took over as acting C.I.A. director, first when Leon E. Panetta was appointed secretary of defense and then when retired Gen. David H. Petraeus resigned over an extramarital affair with his biographer, a relationship that included his handing her classified notes of his time as America’s best-known military commander.

Mr. Morell says he first learned of the affair from Mr. Petraeus only the night before he resigned, and just as the Benghazi events were turning into a political firestorm. While praising Mr. Petraeus, who had told his deputy “I am very lucky” to run the C.I.A., Mr. Morell writes that “the organization did not feel the same way about him.” The former general “created the impression through the tone of his voice and his body language that he did not want people to disagree with him (which was not true in my own interaction with him),” he says.

But it is his account of the Benghazi attacks — and how the C.I.A. was drawn into the debate over whether the Obama White House deliberately distorted its account of the death of Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens — that is bound to attract attention, at least partly because of its relevance to the coming presidential election. The initial assessments that the C.I.A. gave to the White House said demonstrations had preceded the attack. By the time analysts reversed their opinion, Susan E. Rice, now the national security adviser, had made a series of statements on Sunday talk shows describing the initial assessment. The controversy and other comments Ms. Rice made derailed Mr. Obama’s plan to appoint her as secretary of state.

The experience prompted Mr. Morell to write that the C.I.A. should stay out of the business of preparing talking points — especially on issues that are being seized upon for “political purposes.” He is critical of the State Department for not beefing up security in Libya for its diplomats, as the C.I.A., he said, did for its employees.

But he concludes that the assault in which the ambassador was killed took place “with little or no advance planning” and “was not well organized.” He says the attackers “did not appear to be looking for Americans to harm. They appeared intent on looting and conducting some vandalism,” setting fires that killed Mr. Stevens and a security official, Sean Smith.

Mr. Morell paints a picture of an agency that was struggling, largely unsuccessfully, to understand dynamics in the Middle East and North Africa when the Arab Spring broke out in late 2011 in Tunisia. The agency’s analysts failed to see the forces of revolution coming — and then failed again, he writes, when they told Mr. Obama that the uprisings would undercut Al Qaeda by showing there was a democratic pathway to change.

“There is no good explanation for our not being able to see the pressures growing to dangerous levels across the region,” he writes. The agency had again relied too heavily “on a handful of strong leaders in the countries of concern to help us understand what was going on in the Arab street,” he says, and those leaders themselves were clueless.

Moreover, an agency that has always overvalued secretly gathered intelligence and undervalued “open source” material “was not doing enough to mine the wealth of information available through social media,” he writes. “We thought and told policy makers that this outburst of popular revolt would damage Al Qaeda by undermining the group’s narrative,” he writes.

Instead, weak governments in Egypt, and the absence of governance from Libya to Yemen, were “a boon to Islamic extremists across both the Middle East and North Africa.”

Mr. Morell is gentle about most of the politicians he dealt with — he expresses admiration for both Mr. Bush and Mr. Obama, though he accuses former Vice President Dick Cheney of deliberately implying a connection between Al Qaeda and Iraq that the C.I.A. had concluded probably did not exist. But when it comes to the events leading up to the Bush administration’s decision to go to war in Iraq, he is critical of his own agency.

Mr. Morell concludes that the Bush White House did not have to twist intelligence on Saddam Hussein’s alleged effort to rekindle the country’s work on weapons of mass destruction.

“The view that hard-liners in the Bush administration forced the intelligence community into its position on W.M.D. is just flat wrong,” he writes. “No one pushed. The analysts were already there and they had been there for years, long before Bush came to office.”

Ex-C.I.A. Official Rebuts Republican Claims on Benghazi Attack in ‘The Great War of Our Time’

Ms. Crough played the youngest daughter on the hit ’70s sitcom starring David Cassidy and Shirley Jones.

Suzanne Crough, Actress in ‘The Partridge Family,’ Dies at 52

Mr. Paczynski was one of the concentration camp’s longest surviving inmates and served as the personal barber to its Nazi commandant Rudolf Höss.

Jozef Paczynski, Inmate Barber to Auschwitz Commandant, Dies at 95

Mr. King sang for the Drifters and found success as a solo performer with hits like “Spanish Harlem.”

Ben E. King, Soulful Singer of ‘Stand by Me,’ Dies at 76

With 12 tournament victories in his career, Mr. Peete was the most successful black professional golfer before Tiger Woods.

Calvin Peete, 71, a Racial Pioneer on the PGA Tour, Is Dead

Hired in 1968, a year before their first season, Mr. Fanning spent 25 years with the team, managing them to their only playoff appearance in Canada.

Jim Fanning, 87, Dies; Lifted Baseball in Canada With Expos

Public perceptions of race relations in America have grown substantially more negative in the aftermath of the death of a young black man who was injured while in police custody in Baltimore and the subsequent unrest, far eclipsing the sentiment recorded in the wake of turmoil in Ferguson, Mo., last summer.

Americans are also increasingly likely to say that the police are more apt to use deadly force against a black person, the latest New York Times/CBS News poll finds.

The poll findings highlight the challenges for local leaders and police officials in trying to maintain order while sustaining faith in the criminal justice system in a racially polarized nation.

Sixty-one percent of Americans now say race relations in this country are generally bad. That figure is up sharply from 44 percent after the fatal police shooting of Michael Brown and the unrest that followed in Ferguson in August, and 43 percent in December. In a CBS News poll just two months ago, 38 percent said race relations were generally bad. Current views are by far the worst of Barack Obama’s presidency.

The negative sentiment is echoed by broad majorities of blacks and whites alike, a stark change from earlier this year, when 58 percent of blacks thought race relations were bad, but just 35 percent of whites agreed. In August, 48 percent of blacks and 41 percent of whites said they felt that way.

Looking ahead, 44 percent of Americans think race relations are worsening, up from 36 percent in December. Forty-one percent of blacks and 46 percent of whites think so. Pessimism among whites has increased 10 points since December.

Continue reading the main story
Do you think race relations in the United States are generally good or generally bad?
60
40
20
0
White
Black
May '14
May '15
Generally bad
Continue reading the main story
Do you think race relations in the United States are getting better, getting worse or staying about the same?
Getting worse
Staying the same
Getting better
Don't know/No answer
All adults
Whites
Blacks
44%
37
17
46
36
16
41
42
15

The poll finds that profound racial divisions in views of how the police use deadly force remain. Blacks are more than twice as likely to say police in most communities are more apt to use deadly force against a black person — 79 percent of blacks say so compared with 37 percent of whites. A slim majority of whites say race is not a factor in a police officer’s decision to use deadly force.

Overall, 44 percent of Americans say deadly force is more likely to be used against a black person, up from 37 percent in August and 40 percent in December.

Blacks also remain far more likely than whites to say they feel mostly anxious about the police in their community. Forty-two percent say so, while 51 percent feel mostly safe. Among whites, 8 in 10 feel mostly safe.

One proposal to address the matter — having on-duty police officers wear body cameras — receives overwhelming support. More than 9 in 10 whites and blacks alike favor it.

Continue reading the main story
How would you describe your feelings about the police in your community? Would you say they make you feel mostly safe or mostly anxious?
Mostly safe
Mostly anxious
Don't know/No answer
All adults
Whites
Blacks
75%
21
3
81
16
3
51
42
7
Continue reading the main story
In general, do you think the police in most communities are more likely to use deadly force against a black person, or more likely to use it against a white person, or don’t you think race affects police use of deadly force?
Police more likely to use deadly force against a black person
Police more likely to use deadly force against a white person
Race DOES NOT affect police use of deadly force
Don't know/No answer
All adults
Whites
Blacks
44%
37%
79%
2%
2%
1%
46%
53%
16%
9%
8%
4%
Continue reading the main story
Do you favor or oppose on-duty police officers wearing video cameras that would record events and actions as they occur?
Favor
Oppose
Don't know/No answer
All adults
Whites
Blacks
92%
93%
93%
6%
5%
5%
2%
2%
2%

Asked specifically about the situation in Baltimore, most Americans expressed at least some confidence that the investigation by local authorities would be conducted fairly. But while nearly two-thirds of whites think so, fewer than half of blacks agree. Still, more blacks are confident now than were in August regarding the investigation in Ferguson. On Friday, six members of the police force involved in the arrest of Mr. Gray were charged with serious offenses, including manslaughter. The poll was conducted Thursday through Sunday; results from before charges were announced are similar to those from after.

Reaction to the recent turmoil in Baltimore, however, is similar among blacks and whites. Most Americans, 61 percent, say the unrest after Mr. Gray’s death was not justified. That includes 64 percent of whites and 57 percent of blacks.

Continue reading the main story
As you may know, a Baltimore man, Freddie Gray, recently died after being in the custody of the Baltimore police. How much confidence do you have that the investigation by local authorities into this matter will be conducted fairly?
A lot
Some
Not much
None at all
Don't know/No answer
All adults
Whites
Blacks
29%
31
22
14
5
31
33
20
11
5
20
26
30
22
In general, do you think the unrest in Baltimore after the death of Freddie Gray was justified, or do you think the unrest was not justified?
Justified
Not justified
Don't know/No answer
All adults
Whites
Blacks
28%
61
11
26
64
11
37
57
6

Negative View of U.S. Race Relations Grows, Poll Finds

Fullmer, who reigned when fight clubs abounded and Friday night fights were a television staple, was known for his title bouts with Sugar Ray Robinson and Carmen Basilio.

Gene Fullmer, a Brawling Middleweight Champion, Dies at 83
harga umroh ramadhan di Bali Mester jakarta
paket promo umroh maret di Cipinang Cempedak jakarta
harga umroh maret di Cipinang jakarta
biaya umrah maret di Cipinang Besar Selatan jakarta
biaya paket umrah januari di Utan Kayu Selatan jakarta
biaya berangkat umroh januari di Batuampar jakarta
harga umroh juni di Cipayung jakarta
biaya paket umroh juni di Pondok Bambu jakarta
harga umrah maret di Rawamangun jakarta
paket berangkat umrah mei di Setu jakarta
paket umrah desember di Cipinang Besar Utara jakarta
paket promo umroh februari di Kramat Jati jakarta
biaya berangkat umroh juni di Pisangan Baru jakarta
paket promo umrah juni di Halim Perdanakusuma jakarta
biaya paket berangkat umroh april di Rawamangun jakarta
biaya paket berangkat umroh desember di Pal Meriam jakarta
paket promo umroh april di Kampung Melayu jakarta
biaya berangkat umroh ramadhan di Pinang Ranti jakarta
harga berangkat umroh ramadhan di Cililitan jakarta
biaya umrah ramadhan di Dukuh jakarta
biaya umroh juni di Cipayung jakarta
paket berangkat umrah juni di Bidaracina jakarta
biaya paket umroh maret di Ujung Menteng jakarta
promo berangkat umroh maret di Bambu Apus jakarta
harga paket berangkat umrah mei di Cililitan jakarta
paket berangkat umrah akhir tahun di Munjul jakarta
harga berangkat umroh ramadhan di Cibubur jakarta
biaya paket umrah desember di Cibubur jakarta
paket berangkat umrah mei di Penggilingan jakarta
promo berangkat umroh maret umrohdepag.com
biaya paket umroh juni di Kampung Gedong,Cijantung jakarta
biaya umrah maret di Bambu Apus jakarta
promo berangkat umroh januari di Cibubur jakarta
paket promo umroh desember di Ciracas jakarta
paket umroh ramadhan depok
paket umrah ramadhan di Kampung Gedong,Cijantung jakarta
biaya berangkat umroh februari di Cipinang Muara jakarta
harga paket umroh akhir tahun di Kebon Manggis jakarta
promo umroh akhir tahun di Munjul jakarta
paket promo berangkat umrah januari di Utan Kayu Selatan jakarta
promo berangkat umroh februari di Ceger jakarta
biaya berangkat umrah desember di Pasar Rebo jakarta
paket promo umroh mei di Kayu Manis jakarta
harga paket berangkat umroh maret di Cawang jakarta
harga umrah januari di Pondok Ranggon jakarta
promo umroh april di Cilangkap jakarta
biaya berangkat umrah akhir tahun di Pisangan Baru jakarta
harga paket umroh april di Rawamangun jakarta
paket umrah april di Pulo Gadung jakarta
biaya paket umroh ramadhan di Susukan jakarta
biaya paket berangkat umrah akhir tahun di Makasar jakarta
paket berangkat umroh akhir tahun di Kampung Gedong,Cijantung jakarta
harga paket umrah awal tahun di Cakung jakarta
harga umroh akhir tahun di Cililitan jakarta
paket promo berangkat umroh ramadhan di Cakung jakarta
paket promo umroh ramadhan tangerang
biaya berangkat umroh februari di Kampung Gedong,Cijantung jakarta
paket promo umroh mei di Ciracas jakarta
paket promo umrah april di Kampung Melayu jakarta
paket promo umroh juni di Pondok Bambu jakarta
harga berangkat umrah juni di Pasar Rebo jakarta
biaya berangkat umroh desember di Susukan jakarta
paket berangkat umroh akhir tahun di Duren Sawit jakarta
harga berangkat umrah awal tahun di Jatinegara Kaum jakarta
promo umroh april di Bidaracina jakarta
paket umrah februari di Cipinang Melayu jakarta
biaya berangkat umroh mei di Utan Kayu Selatan jakarta
paket berangkat umrah maret di Pulogebang jakarta
paket berangkat umrah juni di Kampung Gedong,Cijantung jakarta
harga paket berangkat umroh juni di Kramat Jati jakarta
biaya umrah maret di Rawa Bunga jakarta
paket berangkat umrah februari di Balekambang jakarta
paket berangkat umroh awal tahun di Susukan jakarta
paket promo umrah april di Susukan jakarta
biaya paket berangkat umrah ramadhan di Pulo Gadung jakarta
biaya paket berangkat umroh ramadhan bogor
paket promo umrah januari di Rambutan jakarta
paket umroh ramadhan di Batuampar jakarta
biaya berangkat umrah januari di Cibubur jakarta
paket berangkat umroh januari di Dukuh jakarta
biaya paket berangkat umrah januari di Pal Meriam jakarta
biaya paket umrah desember di Kramat Jati jakarta
biaya berangkat umrah januari di Jatinegara jakarta
paket berangkat umrah desember di Makasar jakarta
biaya berangkat umroh maret di Pal Meriam jakarta
harga paket umroh januari di Jatinegara jakarta
promo umroh februari di Pulo Gadung jakarta
biaya berangkat umrah april di Kalisari jakarta
paket promo umrah desember di Cipayung jakarta
harga berangkat umroh desember di Utan Kayu Selatan jakarta
paket umroh juni di Kayu Putih jakarta
harga paket umroh april di Utan Kayu Utara jakarta
paket promo berangkat umroh februari di Pondok Bambu jakarta
biaya umrah desember di Pasar Rebo jakarta
biaya paket berangkat umroh akhir tahun di Pulogebang jakarta
promo umroh mei di Bali Mester jakarta
biaya paket berangkat umroh akhir tahun di Batuampar jakarta
biaya paket umroh maret di Cawang jakarta
paket umrah mei di Ciracas jakarta
harga paket berangkat umroh desember di Jatinegara jakarta